All articles written by John Howard, Ph.D., except
where noted.
A PATCHWORK QUILT OF HR NEWS AND STORIES
NEW DOL RULE
In February, the Department of Labor's Office of Federal
Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) put into effect a new rule
requiring virtually any employer who performs contract work for
the government to collect race and gender data on their job applicant
pool, including applicants from the Internet. Internet applicants
are the focus of the new rule.
While the major Internet job boards (including Yahoo, Monster
and CareerBuilder) complained the task was too much of a burden,
some smaller online application providers installed EEOC data
collection sections on their Internet applications and went on
with their business.
Advice to employers: Unless you are certain you are exempt from
collecting EEOC data based on your size and type of work and
where you do business, it's safer to collect the data than to
assume you'll never be asked for it.
RISK OF EMPLOYEE DEFECTION UP
MetLife's annual "Employee Benefits Trend Study" found that
22 percent of all employees changed jobs in the last year and-a-half,
compared to 17 percent in a similar period in their 2004 study.
In one demographic subgroup of young families with children under
age 6, it was nearly one-third higher!
Employee participants in the study reported their top priorities
when deciding to stay or go (and where to go) were the "quality
of co-worker and/or customer relationships," "opportunity for
work-life balance" and "an organization whose purpose/mission
I agree with."
Employers facing worker shortages, take note!
WILL YOU BE SUED NEXT?
According to the Chubb Insurance Group, one in four privately
held companies has been sued in the past few years by an employee
or a former employee. In the same report, executives at half
the companies surveyed consider it likely they will be sued by
employees, and nearly one-third believe they would be likely
to lose and their companies seriously damaged by such a lawsuit.
Nearly half expected an employee to file an EEOC complaint during
the year.
The additional responsibility and pressure such an environment
puts on HR staff is obvious, even if the actual numbers turn
out to be wrong. The expectation itself provides the pressure!
APPLICANT TRACKING
As HR managers and recruiting staff increase their load in
high-turnover environments, the science of applicant tracking
has become an increasingly important tool for success.
A recent study of the effects of good applicant tracking systems
showed one such high-turnover business was able to increase its
labor productivity by a measured 44 percent with the use of improved
applicant tracking! Effects of reduced time to hire and proper
placement combined to essentially have the same impact as an
increase in head count but without the associated cost.
HR PROFESSIONALS TRY TO KEEP UP WITH FIELD
As the articles above attest, the term "HR Generalist" has
never had broader implications. Federal law changes, employee
loyalty challenges, risk of expensive lawsuits arising from HR
policies, keeping up with technology, science and metrics, and
more demanding (but rewarding) professional certification standards
- it's hard to find time to just do the daily workload!
NEW RECERTIFICATION OPPORTUNITIES FOR HR PROFESSIONALS - BILL
FOSTER, SPHR
The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) has initiated new recertification
requirements for HR professionals who have been awarded the Senior Professional
in Human Resources (SPHR) credential. Under the new requirements, SPHR certificants
must earn 15 of their required 60 recertification credit hours specifically in
the strategic management functional area.
The HR Certification Institute (HRCI) test specifications define strategic
management as "the processes and activities used to formulate HR objectives,
practices and policies to meet the short- and long-range organizational needs
and opportunities, to guide and lead the change process and to evaluate HR's
contribution to organizational effectiveness." This definition is the basis
of the new strategic management recertification requirements.
Under the new rules, the types of continuing education experiences that count
toward the specified credit hours in strategic management actually give certificants
opportunities to explore beyond conventional "HR-related" seminars and workshops.
Some examples that could fulfill the strategic management requirement are:
1. Interpret information from internal sources, including marketing, financial/accounting,
operations and IT, to participate in strategic planning and policy-making.
To be effective strategic partners, HR professionals must know the "business
of business" and how it relates to the HR function and the organization's strategic
goals. Continuing education experiences that may count toward the strategic
management requirement might include upper-level business writing courses,
marketing workshops, finance for nonfinancial managers and seminars discussing
trends in the workplace.
2. Interpret information related to the general business environment, industry
practices and developments, and technological developments from external sources
to participate in strategic planning and policy-making.
HR professionals should be able to take work-related information from various
resources, synthesize it and apply it to their own work settings. An example
of a "recertification" experience that could count under the strategic management
area would be research and development of an environmental scan for presentation
during an organization's strategic planning meeting.
3. Participate as a partner in the organization's strategic planning process.
Certificants would receive credit for first-time participation in a strategic
planning process within their organizations.
4. Establish strategic relationships with individuals in the organization,
to influence organizational decision-making. An example might include learning
about organizational culture and its effect on HR policies and practices.
5. Establish relationships/alliances with key individuals in the community
and in professional capacities to help meet the organization's strategic needs.
Certificants could receive strategic management credits for HR-related work,
including organizational social responsibility components such as welfare-to-work
or school-to-work programs, philanthropic activities or alliances with community
organizations.
Recertification credit would not be awarded for merely participating in company-sponsored
activities. Certificants must be prepared to demonstrate their involvement
in the program and how their HR expertise helped them succeed.
6. Evaluate HR's contribution to organizational effectiveness, including assessment,
design, implementation and evaluation of activities with respect to strategic
and organizational measurement in HR objectives (refers to participation in
change management).
It is not enough to introduce new programs and initiatives within an organization,
but HR must also constantly evaluate its return on investment. Recertification
credit could result from designing and implementing such programs or for participating
in training on measuring HR's contribution to organizational effectiveness.
7. Provide direction and guidance during change in organizational processes,
operations, planning, intervention, leadership training and culture. Demonstrated
on-the-job leadership in change management could qualify for strategic management
recertification credits.
8. Develop and shape organizational policy related to the organization's management
of its human resources.
Demonstrate first-time on-the-job experience, developing policy based on your
organization's specific needs, such as instituting a telecommuting policy.
9. Cultivate leadership and ethical values in self and others through modeling
and teaching.
Possible credits awarded include participation in leadership training and
development of an organization's code of ethics.
10. Provide information for the budgeting process, including budget development
and review.
To be leaders, HR professionals must have knowledge of budget development
and review. HR professionals who need additional training in this area could
earn credits for continuing education in finance for nonfinancial managers,
budget development, forecasting and project management.
11. Monitor legislative environment for proposed changes in law and take action
to support, modify or stop the proposed change (write a member of Congress,
give expert testimony at a public hearing, lobby legislators). Credits could
be awarded for work to influence the outcome of workplace legislation or legislation
affecting your industry. This could include providing testimony and writing
or meeting with legislators. HRCI awards one credit hour for testifying to
Congress or a state legislative body.
Much of the training and administration involved in a Profiles Checkpoint
360°/Skillbuilder™ series could qualify for recertification credits under these
new guidelines.
EFFECTS OF HIRING UNDERPRODUCERS IN SALES -MIKE HOPKINS & MARK
WATHEN
A well-known national company provides personal development and
coaching services across the U.S. and has done so for over 20 years. Their
sales process is highly structured. Leads are generated from a variety of sources,
including infomercials, Internet campaigns and traditional advertising channels.
Once a lead is captured and qualified, an appointment is set for a telephone
presentation, most often including both members of a married or committed couple
as prospects. The sales professionals we measured here conduct the scripted
telephone session. The interview goal is a sale in the range of $2,000 to $8,000
consisting of one or a combination of the company's personal and business development
training courses.
Obviously, a great deal of money and time has already been invested by the
time an appointment begins, and both the company and the salesperson need to
close a high percentage of the interviews conducted. New salespeople complete
a five-week training course and transition from an hourly compensation period
to a commission-only system within a relatively short time.
The company currently staffs approximately 130 full-time sales positions.
They anticipate, based on last year's statistics, that they will need to hire
200 new salespeople to fill an anticipated 76 new vacancies in the sales staff
since only about one-in-three hires actually finish the training and succeed
in their first few weeks in becoming commissioned salespeople. As with the
sales process itself, this process of developing new sales representatives
is very expensive. The company is highly motivated to reduce sales turnover
and to increase average close ratios of the sales force, if possible.
For this initial study, three groups of salespeople were selected by management,
based on tenure (on the sales floor more than six months) and closing ratios.
These groups were separated into "top," middle" and "marginal" performers,
based on the closing ratios. All subjects completed the Profile XT™ assessment.
A job match pattern was prepared for the top-performing group, and all subjects
were matched to this pattern.
The results were dramatic. The top performing group matched the pattern at
an average of 88.5 percent, and no member of that group scored less than 83
percent. The middle group averaged 71.8 percent match, and the marginal group
averaged 70 percent match. Clearly, the assessment differentiated between people
who were top performers and those who were not. To a lesser extent, it also
differentiated between middle and marginal performers.
In this setting, top performers produced annual sales of $500,000-plus and
earned commissions in the six-figure range. By contrast, marginal performers
produced in the range of $200,000, earning average commissions less than $50,000.
Not surprisingly, this was the group with the most turnover. They did not fit
their jobs well and they presumably had employment alternatives compensating
as well or better.
For the company, the opportunities are clear. If they are making 76 selections
in a year, each good decision (hiring a likely top performer) is worth an additional
$300,000 in potential sales. In the first year, this represents a potential
$22-million-plus sales increase! In addition, if they hire more people with
the characteristics and production of their "top performers," their recruiting,
training, turnover and missed opportunity costs will decrease. The combined
result should be significant gains in overall profitability.

"If you have always done it that way, it is probably wrong."
- Charles Kettering |